Freeing Buses from Traffic Gridlock Would Be Money Well Spent

by Ethan C. Campbell

As a researcher studying the polar oceans, my colleagues and I watched with trepidation as the past seven years brought low after record low in the sea ice ringing Antarctica. Recent studies conclude that our planet’s powerful freezer is defrosting–or, in technical terms, experiencing a ‘regime shift’–one of many harbingers of a destabilizing climate system.

In the Pacific Northwest, those signs have come in the form of worsening heatwaves, wildfires, and loss of mountain snowpack, among others. For me, climate change is doubly personal. The smoke that choked our city’s skies two summers ago brought back the chronic asthma that I hadn’t experienced since childhood. Climate impacts are not theoretical—they’re real.

The scale of warming is global, but its causes are local. Nearly two-thirds of Seattle’s core greenhouse gas emissions come from transportation, with nine out of every ten of those carbon dioxide molecules coming out of a car’s tailpipe. Our climate crisis stems in large part from a century of over-investing in a car-centric transportation system. Seattle ought to be leading the nation in shifting to a new paradigm.

Instead, the City’s plan for its next eight years of transportation funding would pave the way for more driving—literally. The $1.45 billion transportation levy proposal released by Mayor Harrell earlier this month would devote a whopping $423 million in property tax dollars to street repaving. That’s a 46% annualized increase compared to the current levy, even after accounting for inflation since its passage in 2015. Meanwhile, the levy renewal would slash funding for transit projects by an inflation-adjusted 16%, down to $145 million. This loss in spending power is even more pronounced when considering that construction costs have soared by 66% since 2015, far outpacing inflation.

While smoother streets are important, the levy’s proposed investments are strikingly out of balance for a city that has committed to more than doubling transit ridership by 2030 in its own Climate Change Response Framework. Meeting even this modest goal of 24% of trips taken by transit–six years into this levy–will only happen if buses become significantly faster and more reliable so that they are a realistic alternative to driving for more residents.

Today, buses are too often stuck in traffic gridlock, causing cascading delays and agonizing uncertainty for riders like me. It’s no wonder many residents opt to drive—a feedback loop that worsens congestion and further discourages ridership. Indeed, Seattle commuters report that travel time is the primary determinant of their travel mode choices, far above other factors like perceptions of safety on transit.

The city knows what works: carving out dedicated transit lanes is a proven solution that ensures efficient bus service and that turbocharges ridership. Yet the levy proposal would only make major upgrades to existing bus routes on “up to four streets,” with an included map of its paltry transit commitments barren in most neighborhoods. One hundred sixty unspecified, lower-cost spot improvements are also promised: a new transit priority signal here, a new bus shelter there.

Fixing pinch points and improving riders’ basic comfort is certainly vital—over 75% of bus stops lack protection from the elements. But the proposed funding must grow to meet the need, which a coalition of advocates has estimated at 60 linear miles of transit corridors. The Mayor’s addition of $20 million following community criticism of last month’s initial proposal is woefully inadequate, in part appearing to be a budgeting sleight-of-hand from moving an existing large capital project in South Lake Union into the transit category.

Expanding Seattle residents’ access to transit will also require constructing sidewalks on the 848 miles of streets that have none and filling gaps in our city’s almost comically disconnected bike network. Allocating only 43% of the next transportation levy’s spending to walking, rolling, biking, transit, and street safety, collectively–exactly the same percentage as the 2015 levy–hardly suggests the urgency demanded by this pivotal moment.

The Seattle City Council is now tasked with amending the levy renewal before sending it to voters. Members of the public can comment at hearings on May 21 and June 4 to urge the city to dream bigger. Council members should increase–or at least restore–transit project funding, as well as boost other investments in multimodal travel.

New polling released earlier this month indicates enthusiastic support for a more robust, $1.9 billion package that enables buses to run reliably and frequently, consistent with an earlier city-commissioned poll that showed a larger levy passing with sizable margins. For many Seattleites, spending a dollar or two more per month for fast, convenient bus service could more than pay for itself through lower gas costs—and perhaps even the opportunity to ditch their car entirely, a move that would save the average US household around $10,000 a year.

Repurposing street space to unlock the emissions-reducing potential of transit is both popular and essential if Seattle is to meet its climate goals, while cutting transit funding will only add fuel to the fire. Our collective future depends on cities like Seattle prioritizing smart climate solutions over maintaining the car-centric status quo. If not in the next eight years, then when?

Ethan C. Campbell is a volunteer with Central Seattle Greenways, part of the Seattle Neighborhood Greenways coalition, and a Ph.D. candidate studying ocean physics at the University of Washington.

The Stranger

girl in red, Northwest Folklife Festival, and More Top Picks

by EverOut Staff

We’re supplying our top picks all the way through to Memorial Day, so read on for details on events from girl in red to Billy Joel and from Miranda July with Laurie Frankel to the Northwest Folklife Festival

MONDAY
FOOD & DRINK

Cookbook Dinner Series at Delancey: Rooted Kitchen, Ashley Rodriguez
Perhaps you’ve picked up a copy of the cult favorite mushroom field guide All That the Rain Promises and More or spotted Alexis Nikole’s delightful foraging videos on YouTube before and thought to yourself that you’d like to try your hand at tracking down your own food in the wild. After all, we do live in the bountiful Pacific Northwest. Local food writer Ashley Rodriguez, creator of the award-winning blog Not Without Salt, is here to help your dreams become a reality with her newest cookbook, Rooted Kitchen, which contains a gorgeous collection of recipes that promise to help you connect to the natural world, along with preserving, fermenting, beginner foraging techniques, and mindfulness activities. She’ll join the acclaimed pizzeria Delancey for a five-course spring meal inspired by the book, with wine pairings included. JULIANNE BELL
(Delancey, Ballard)

The Stranger

When book distributor Small Press Distribution closed suddenly in March, Seattle’s Asterism Books stepped in to help.

by Josh Fomon

Seattle prides itself as a bookish, well-read city with a storied literary heritage of Pulitzer- and National Book Award-winning writers and publishers. Seattle’s literary culture is so vibrant and rich that it earned the city a UNESCO Creative City of Literature designation in 2017. But this April, Seattle’s role in North America’s small press publishing world was elevated to a new level of importance when one of the few remaining independent book distributors in America, Bay-area Small Press Distribution (SPD), shuttered without warning in late March. SPD sent out only an email and a social media post after 55 years of serving small indie publishers, as first reported by Publishers Weekly, LitHub, and the Washington Post

Book distribution is a vital yet often unseen part of publishing. It’s how many presses get their books into readers’ hands, usually through bookseller, library, or direct orders, which the distributor fulfills. SPD’s closure has left more than 350 small press publishers scrambling to find a new distributor for the 300,000 books SPD has left in limbo. Enter Pioneer Square’s Asterism Books.

“I was hunched down by a shelf pulling books for an order when Josh came in and told me, ‘SPD folded. It’s gone,’” recounted Laura Paul, marketing director of Asterism Books and Sublunary Editions, “I was in shock.” 

Asterism Books started in 2021 as Asterism by Joshua Rothes, publisher of Sublunary Editions, and then later relaunched as Asterism Books with Chatwin Books and Arundel Books’ Phil Bevis. They’re one of the few independent book distributors in the United States stepping forward to fill the void left by SPD’s closure. 

“We’re trying to get people on a lifeboat,” said Paul of Asterism Books’ attempt to extend a lifeline to many of the independent publishers trying to find a new distributor. “Within three days, Asterism had more than 100 publisher applications. We’ve been taking meetings nonstop, building new bookshelves, and trying to expedite approvals for over 30 publishers,” Paul shared. 

“The SPD closure exemplifies why we need more distributors, not less. Since US book distribution has become increasingly consolidated, if something happens to one company, it takes out a huge portion of the entire system. It’s dangerous to the freedom of books to circulate, and whose texts will get seen and read.”

The Pacific Northwest is no stranger to book distribution, according to Rick Simonson, long-time book buyer and reading series manager of Elliott Bay Book Company. He said, “Seattle has been home to some good wholesaler and distribution centers before, dating back through the decades, though none were devoted strictly to literary presses as Asterism is. Having Pacific Pipeline, Moving Books, Partners West, Koen Pacific, and others here all served the regional bookselling community well—they made the bookstores here all better.”

Elliott Bay Book Company aka book heaven. Ben Lindbloom

Local Presses Feel the Pressure

One of the local publishers dealing with SPD’s closure is Anne de Marcken, editor and publisher of Olympia’s the 3rd Thing Press and winner of the Novel Prize for her novel It Lasts Forever and Then It’s Over. De Marcken, who had been using SPD for the 3rd Thing, had coincidentally run into Rothes the night before SPD shuttered: “I was shocked by the suddenness of SPD’s announcement, but I was not surprised. Things had been rocky at SPD for some time. As it happens, the night before the fateful communication from SPD, I ran into Joshua Rothes at Third Place Books—we set a time to talk the following Monday about finally making the shift. I sent him a note the next morning saying maybe we’d better move up that conversation. Within 24 hours, we had an agreement in place and by the end of the next week, all our titles were listed for sale on the Asterism site.” 

Despite signing Asterism as a book distributor, de Marcken says the 3rd Thing Press is still walking a short-term financial tightrope: “We estimate that we’re owed about $5,000. [SPD’s closure] does leave us in a precarious position … a little more precarious than usual.”

Knox Gardner, Publisher and Editor-in-Chief of Seattle’s Entre Ríos Books, which also recently signed with Asterism, echoed de Marcken’s experience: “Like everyone else, I learned of SPD’s closure with an email in the morning—not surprised that they were closing, but shocked that they just closed with no planning or information on how to get our books back from the new warehouse.” 

While still unexpected, Gardner saw the writing on the wall: “Did I see it coming? Yes. I had two phone calls over the last several months—one of them just the week before the closure—with staff there about issues we were having: books not listed correctly, if at all, advertising we paid for that was not happening, and even in the small quantity of books we work with, clearly no books were being sold, which was noticeable.” 

SPD’s Closure Creates Financial Headwinds

There are two concerns for many indie publishers like the 3rd Thing and Entre Ríos. First, SPD sent all 300,000 books to two major book distributors, Ingram and Publishers Storage and Shipping (PSCC), and their closure has left presses searching to find where their books are and saddling them with shipping costs to recoup their stock. Gardner lamented, “We’re probably going to lose about $1,000 dollars getting our books back.”

Second, publishers claim SPD still owes many of the presses substantial amounts of sales that haven’t yet been paid out—to the tune of at least tens of thousands of dollars, if not hundreds of thousands in total. Portland press Fonograf Editions alleges SPD owes them $12,000 in royalties, while other presses around the country are sharing similar situations. The full extent of SPD’s purported financial impropriety will most likely be revealed in its dissolution by the California Supreme Court, though there are serious questions about whether or not presses will see any money at all. 

According to ProPublica’s Nonprofit Explorer, SPD’s last nonprofit tax filing from 2022 shows they were already operating at a negative net income of over $200,000, with net assets of just over $18,000—a potentially ominous sign for those presses looking to recoup the money they are owed through sales. While $1,000 or $5,000 may be a drop in the bucket for the “Big Five” publishers—Hachette Book Group, HarperCollins, Macmillan Publishers, Penguin Random House, and Simon & Schuster—and their subsidiaries, small presses often operate on already tight budgets and publish work that doesn’t always reach the mainstream (with some even actively avoiding it). 

Simonson shared, “Small and independent presses are vital because they’re the starting point for so many writers, ideas, notions, aesthetics (including translation) that may not pass a big commercial sniff test. Big publishers actually follow the leads of independent presses when and where the indie presses hit on something that takes off. The big publishers chase as much as they make, at least from the seed of things. And there’s an ebb and flow. Small presses can handle small scale better than big publishers. 

“Small and indie presses can also operate anywhere, more sustainably if they develop distribution systems. But you can have small presses in Seattle, Port Townsend, Buffalo, Wyoming, Ashtabula, Biloxi, Minneapolis, Dallas, and Albuquerque, while the corporate houses pretty much roost only in New York, at least in this country.”

Small publishers often have much smaller print runs and limited titles, which often precludes them from being able to use major distributors like Ingram or PSCC. But that also allows them to take more chances on debut writers, publish more experimental or audacious work, and create space for writers and readers who haven’t historically been represented.

According to Third Place Ravenna’s General Manager, Kalani Kapahua, “LGBTQIA+ and BIPOC authors often find homes at small presses.” In fact, Kapahua has already seen what SPD’s closure means in terms of representation: “One of the main titles I have been monitoring and ordering in for the store is Hannah Baer’s trans girl suicide museum, which has sold a half dozen or so copies since the end of last year at Ravenna. We were in the process of getting some more in but SPD said it was on backorder on March 19 … knowing that we might not carry a title like trans girl suicide museum again at our store [due to SPD’s closure] is such a disappointment.” At the time of this article’s publication, it should be noted that Hesse Press, publisher of trans girl suicide museum, has since switched to Asterism Books for distribution.

Asterism’s Paving a New Path

One major sticking point differentiates Asterism’s operating model from traditional distributors: “We don’t make money unless books get bought,” opined Paul. 

Operating as a for-profit venture, Asterism eschews traditional distributor fees in lieu of a 24% cut of each book sale, the price of which is set by individual publishers along with a bookseller discount. In contrast, many book distributors have traditionally charged fees, particularly to store books in their warehouses, a practice SPD used.  

Asterism also doesn’t allow book returns (a common practice) unless a book is damaged or if it’s for an event, and Paul says they also dissuade window shopping for books—that is, consumers finding something they love, taking a picture of it, and ordering it online for a discount later. “We want to specialize in offering books that aren’t found on Amazon, or at least aren’t undercut on price by other platforms. We want to protect the list price, so we can redistribute profits back to creators. We protect the prices set by our publishers, which is a big deal for small presses, who usually are just trying to create good work and break even at best in some cases.”

How Seattle Readers Can Help

Despite a looming publishing crisis, there are direct ways you can help small presses get through this moment. Kapahua suggests, “Purchasing books directly from the presses goes a very long way in this situation,” especially for those presses previously with SPD, which the Community of Literary Magazines and Publishers (CLMP) has compiled. 

Kapahua went on to share that “[i]t sounds like a number of these presses may not be able to continue without SPD in the picture now and the thought of many small presses just shuttering en masse is tragic. I think there needs to be a collective awareness of what SPD’s closing means to the greater publishing landscape. Hopefully, Asterism can immediately fill the void. The fact that Asterism is so new can be a great advantage and they can learn from and adapt to the changes in the industry now.”

Gardner had a more tempered message along with his optimism, “There are a lot of presses that will not have the financial means to get their books back or the ability to pivot quickly to new distribution. … I feel fortunate that I started conversations with Asterism months ago and the very first thing I did after reading this email was to drop them a line, so we will be [working] with them. It’s a different model than SPD, but given the flux in the industry, I am excited to see how it might work out for us and them. Obviously, my goal is to get our authors into as many curious readers’ hands as possible and so I am hopeful that the engaged team at Asterism can help us with that. Poetry is a strange ask, right? Most bookshops will only have a few tiny shelves of it, so it helps bring our books to the attention of shops we might not have a relationship with.” 

Asked what happens to books lost to the system, Paul had a blunt, sobering answer: “They get pulped.”

De Marcken reiterated these sentiments: “We are an entirely volunteer-run operation, so every cent we make from book sales (whether directly through our website or from indie bookstores) goes to paying writers and to publishing the next innovative book. Right now, we’re gearing up for production on Seattle comix artist and poet Mita Mahato’s stunning Arctic Play. We have never relied on donations, but making up for the $5,000 that evaporated when SPD closed is going to take some special magic. Thanks to our fiscal sponsor Northwest Film Forum, all donations are tax deductible. I am hopeful, though, that the community is coming together to find a way through this latest crisis. Authors, small presses, and independent booksellers are extraordinarily resourceful. This is a community of people who care deeply about what they do.”

Readers, who dictate a book’s commercial success, have a lot of collective power to create demand and buzz for a title, which is especially important for a small press, new authors, translations, and work found outside the traditional publishing landscape. Taking a chance on an indie book often allows publishers to give more opportunities for other writers and books down the line—a necessary endeavor in cultivating impactful, important art and culture—and smut and counterculture alike.

Asked why people in Seattle should take note of Asterism, Paul said: “Asterism has been distinctly shaped by Seattle. The company sits at the intersection of technology, culture, and innovation. Buying from us creates social good—reducing economic exploitation in the arts and getting money back into the hands of the people doing creative work.

“We want this space to feel like a community—we want to support local writers, publishers, booksellers and readers, as well as mentor those thinking about starting a press,” she added. And when asked what it’s like to be across from Lumen Field, Paul said she “likes to walk around the stadium and meditate on how many millions go to sports that could be going to books … I joke about having pop-ups during a Mariners game.” 

Make no mistake about this is a vital moment in America’s literary history—SPD’s closure is a huge blow to publishers, writers, booksellers, and readers, but there’s also something inspiring about a group of Seattle entrepreneurs leading the charge to upend a system and ensure writers and creators have the chance to hold space in our country’s zeitgeist with books that might not exist otherwise. 

Paul is hopeful for the future. “The more we can bring people doing quality work and innovating with words into the spotlight, the more people will be excited to read. I think the future is hopefully more of what Asterism is doing—people coming together to share resources and the strength that comes from that.” 

The Stranger

The Ethics Commission thinks her father-in-law’s restaurant could directly benefit if the ordinance passes.

by Hannah Krieg

Council Member Tanya Woo is “asking for a second opinion” after Executive Director of Seattle Ethics and Elections Wayne Barnett advised her to recuse herself from an upcoming vote on a rollback of the minimum wage for gig workers known as “Pay Up.” 

As one of the most business-friendly members on the council, Woo’s recusal would complicate the path to victory for prime sponsor Council President Sara Nelson and the corporations she represents. Nelson already won over four of her colleagues in committee, but Woo seemed to be the most likely fifth vote, with staunch opposition from Council Member Tammy Morales and some caution from Council Members Joy Hollingsworth and Cathy Moore. Woo’s recusal would even further jeopardize Nelson’s ability to secure a veto-proof majority, as rumors circulate about the Mayor using his executive powers to stop the rollback. 

Woo did not immediately respond to my request for comment. 

Barnett’s Advice

Last week, Woo asked Barnett for advice on the ethics of her discussing and voting on the ordinance, which would put wages $6 below the City minimum for gig delivery drivers. Woo’s father-in-law recently took over Kau Kau BBQ in the Chinatown-International District, which contracts with app-based delivery companies. Woo told Barnett that the business has “seen a reduction in smaller dollar orders since the minimum payment ordinance became effective in January of this year,” according to an email exchange.

“It is my advice that you recuse yourself from the discussion and vote on the council bill,” Barnett wrote in an email to Woo on Friday. “I believe that under the federal rule, you would have a financial interest in changes to pay for app-based workers. One of the goals of the legislation is to boost sales at restaurants like the one owned by your family.”

As for amendments to the bill, Barnett said she may vote on amendments that “are unlikely to reduce costs and boost restaurant sales.”

According to the Seattle Ethics Code, a City official may not participate in a matter in which they or an immediate family member have a financial interest. However, the Code does not define “financial interest,” so Barnett based his decision on the Code of Federal Regulations, which states that “a particular matter will have a ‘direct’ effect on a financial interest if there is a close causal link between any decision or action to be taken in the matter and any expected effect of the matter on the financial interest.” 

The definition goes on to read, “An effect may be direct even though it does not occur immediately. A particular matter will not have a direct effect on a financial interest, however, if the chain of causation is attenuated or is contingent upon the occurrence of events that are speculative or that are independent of, and unrelated to, the matter. A particular matter that has an effect on a financial interest only as a consequence of its effects on the general economy does not have a direct effect within the meaning of this part.”

Barnett noted an exception for legislation that “establishes or adjusts assessments, taxes, fees, or rates for water, utility, or other broadly provided public services or facilities that are applied equally, proportionally, or by the same percentage to the elected official’s interest and other businesses, properties, or individuals subject to the assessment, tax, fee, or rate,” but he wrote that the minimum wage ordinance would not qualify for this exemption. 

Barnett told Woo, “If you believe my advice is an incorrect interpretation of the Ethics Code, you have the ability to ask for an opinion from the full Ethics and Elections Commission.” Barnett said she’s seeking a second opinion from the commission—“details to come.” 

As for the Rest of Them

Several Council Members have been under public scrutiny for perceived conflicts of interest when it comes to Pay Up rollbacks, but Barnett gave them the greenlight to participate. 

Nelson faced the most criticism, as she recently sold Fremont Brewing, which she co-founded with her husband, to one of the state’s largest hospitality companies, Seattle Hospitality Group. Seattle Hospitality Group’s portfolio contains at least nine restaurants that use DoorDash, businesses Nelson and her supporters say will benefit from lower-paid gig workers. 

In an email to a concerned constituent, Barnett explained that Nelson and her husband both got a small share in the entity created by the merger of Fremont Brewing Company, Pike Brewing, and Alley Brews, but neither of them got a share in Seattle Hospitality Group. Since Fremont Brewing, Pike Brewing, and Alley Brews do not currently use app-based deliveries, her interest lies not in increasing deliveries but in increased beer sales. Barnett wrote, “I cannot draw a line from changing the minimum labor standards, to the elimination of the fee, to increased grocery store sales, to increased beer sales. At least not one that could be described as causal.”

Critics also flagged potential conflicts of interests for Council Member Maritza Rivera. According to her 2023 financial disclosure, her husband Dan Kully partially owned a consulting firm that worked with DoorDash. A partner at her husband’s firm recently met with Rivera to discuss the ordinance, according to City lobbying records.

According to KNKX, Kully severed financial ties with the firm last spring. When Rivera asked for Barnett’s advice, he determined it would not be a conflict of interest for her to participate.

The Stranger

The Stranger’s morning news roundup.

by Nathalie Graham

Iran’s president dies in helicopter crash: On Sunday, Iran President Ebrahim Raisi, the country’s foreign minister, the governor of Iran’s East Azerbaijan province, and all of their bodyguards were killed. The first reports stated the helicopter “went missing.” Then, after hours of looking, searchers found the wreckage. Raisi, the president, was a “hard-line” kinda guy, someone who oversaw mass executions in 1988 and who supported the growth of Iran’s nuclear program. Most recently, he launched an attack on Israel. Suspicious?? I’ll let the conspiracy theorists decide. 

An arrest warrant for Netanyahu: The chief prosecutor of the International Criminal Court announced he is seeking arrest warrants for Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, Netanyahu’s defense minister Yoav Gallant, and three Hamas leaders for war crimes and crimes against humanity in the Israel-Hamas war. The process of getting these warrants out could take about two months and, even then, the risk of Israeli leaders facing prosecution seems low. A risk of arrest, though, could inhibit their international travels. Mostly, this announcement is symbolic in that it indicates a lack of international support for this war. 

Burien continues to suck ass: Burien doesn’t know what to do about its homeless population unless it’s “treat them like dirt.” To further that end, the Burien City Council is poised to kill a city-funded tiny house project that would provide 35 shelters and places to live for many of the people on Burien’s streets. Despite moving forward with zoning updates to legalize the shelter and having the funding lined up from untapped King County federal pandemic money, the council has two amendments in the works that would “disqualify the property that the City Council selected for the project.”

The weather: It will be pleasant if not a little chilly today. Though, there will be sun. Nothing much to report!

Better than a dust storm: I’ll never complain about boring weather so long as I don’t have to live through a dust storm. 

A large dust storm swept through Great Bend, Kansas, on Sunday as severe weather continues moving through parts of the midwest. pic.twitter.com/VrVLI47m8L

— ABC News (@ABC) May 20, 2024

So long, UW encampment: After nearly three weeks, University of Washington students packed up their solidarity encampment on Sunday afternoon. The university had given them a Monday deadline to clear the encampment after the students and administrators reached a deal on Friday. While the UW did not dismantle its funding relationship with Boeing as students in the encampment demanded, they did come forward with a 14-point agreement which, among other things, detailed an expansion of Palestinian studies and promised to waive tuition for 20 Palestinian students. 

RIP Red Lobster: Despite being an average seafood restaurant and a reward for Beyoncé’s lovers, Red Lobster has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. Red Lobster said it will be selling pretty much all of its assets. We’ll miss you and your cheddar bay biscuits. Mostly just the biscuits, though. 

RIP Bruce Nordstrom: The 90-year-old man was pivotal in growing his family’s business. Maybe you’ve heard of it? Nordstrom? Seattle’s neighborhood retail store? If you’re a Nordstrom simp, thank Bruce. Then grieve him, damn it. Because he’s dead

So long, Jeff Duchin: The director of Public Health – Seattle & King County, Dr. Jeff Duchin, announced his impending retirement, stepping away from the field he worked in for 30 years. Duchin steered King County through the pandemic, a four-year period that often “felt more like 40 years,” he told the Seattle Times. For those of us covering the crisis, Duchin was patient, steady, and skilled at communicating his wealth of arcane information. He’ll be missed.

Bad boy for life literally? Sean “Diddy” Combs apologized for attacking his ex-girlfriend, R&B singer Cassie, after a 2016 video of him violently assaulting her in a hotel hallway circulated late last week. Combs said he was “truly sorry” for his actions. Allegedly, he and his team paid that 2016 hotel $50,000 for its surveillance footage of him attacking Cassie. Last year, Cassie sued Combs for “years of sexual, physical and emotional abuse.” A settlement quickly followed. However, Cassie’s case may just be the tip of the iceberg as more lawsuits came out as well as allegations of human trafficking that led to an FBI raid on Combs’s house. 

Congrats? Travel + Leisure announced the most expensive city in the US for travelers, and it’s—you guessed it—Seattle! Though, the ranking states that Aspen, Colorado is technically more expensive and would rank higher, but it’s unclear whether Aspen qualifies as a city or a town. So, we’re second-most expensive to a remote mountain town that is a playground for the extremely wealthy. 

Trump hush-money trial enters final phase: Welcome to the final phase of the first criminal trial for Donald J. Trump. What’s happening? Such a good question. On Monday, Michael Cohen, Trump’s former personal attorney, will continue testifying. The defense’s cross-examination of Cohen should wrap up today, but then both sides will get another chance to question him again. The prosecution will likely rest its case after that, and then the defense can decide whether to call more witnesses. Trump could take the stand himself, though it’s unclear whether he’ll do that. This is all to say the trial may end as early as later this week. 

Water levels haven’t dropped in Brazil floods: Floods earlier this month killed 115 people and displaced 540,000 in Brazil’s Rio Grande do Sul. The government announced it will build four tent cities to accommodate the 77,000 displaced people who remain without shelter. 

Me, pandering to your sensibilities: Here, watch this man rescue a dog. 

Dramatic video captures the moment a man dove into the Hudson River to save a dog that was struggling off Hoboken, New Jersey. https://t.co/50YjLPGjuW pic.twitter.com/hMMzIJwcR4

— ABC News (@ABC) May 20, 2024

Brain worms strike again: Robert F. Kennedy Jr. listed a New York home in foreclosure for non-payment as his official voting address. Public records don’t show this home as one he owns, nor does it appear he has ever been a resident there. 

A missing plane: A plane and its pilot reportedly left Arlington Municipal Airport at 4:30 pm, but it never arrived at its destination of Ephrata. The Washington State Department of Transportation and King County officials are searching for the missing plane

A song for your Monday: This whole album is nice to listen to on a sunny morning.

The Stranger

Keeping BIPOC Communities in Place as Light Rail Expands Should Be a Key Component of the Seattle Transportation Levy

by Karen Sataka

The Levy to Move Seattle, a property tax put to voters every eight years, presents an opportunity for Mayor Bruce Harrell and the Seattle City Council to set things right in our communities by funding $30 million for land acquisition and community-led planning as we prepare for construction of new light rail stations in our neighborhoods.

What does land acquisition have to do with transportation? Within the lifespan of this levy, Sound Transit plans to build a light rail station at Graham Street in the Rainier Valley and two stations serving the Chinatown/International District. These are significant investments in both areas that are long overdue. However, the City needs to work with the communities to ensure they are not negatively impacted by them and remain true to the theme and goals of Seattle’s comprehensive plan, One Seattle, and the Seattle Transportation Plan. 

A shared goal of both the comprehensive and transportation plans is helping communities remain rooted in their neighborhoods. Graham Street and the C/ID are both neighborhoods where community priorities have been ignored for decades and are both at high risk of displacement

The funding would address this goal by working with the communities to buy land now for family-centric, affordable, workforce housing and other community-led developments. It would also be good for the prospects of the transportation levy passing. Recent polling showed that 55% of voters would be more likely to vote yes on the transportation levy if this priority was included. 

A vision for the future of the Graham Street station. Courtesy of Puget Sound Sage 

We know that light rail and transit expansion often leads to gentrification in Seattle, displacing the very people who were supposed to benefit from the expansion in the first place. The deep irony is that those of us most at risk of displacement use public transportation far more than the higher-wage earners who displace us from our neighborhoods. As our communities are displaced, transit will receive less ridership, affecting both Sound Transit and SDOT’s bottom line, as well as the City’s climate goals to increase public transit ridership.

In preparation for the stations, our communities have put together clear visions to prevent transit-related displacement. In 2018, the Graham Street community action team (Graham Street CAT), representing ten BIPOC-led organizations in the Graham Street area, developed a clear vision and plan to prevent displacement of our communities. 

Through research, community-wide planning sessions, surveys of businesses, tenants, and homeowners, and listening sessions with our own members, we identified key assets in our neighborhood that are at risk of displacement. We estimate that we need to acquire at least 10 acres of land in the neighborhood to develop enough senior and affordable housing, cultural facilities, and community-serving businesses to anchor our community for generations to come.

Advocates fighting proposals to make a transit hub in the C/ID on 4th or 5th Ave. Courtesy of Puget Sound Sage

In the Chinatown/International District, our community fought hard for Sound Transit to build two light rail stations north and south of the C/ID rather than the regional proposals at 5th Ave or 4th Ave that would deeply disrupt our community. These new stations are a once-in-a-generation opportunity to cement Seattle’s legacy in leading the way through Equitable Transit Oriented Development (ETOD) by working with our C/ID community to acquire land that will keep people housed, culturally represented, and remain in place. The Seattle City Council has the opportunity to bring growth without displacement to one of the most disenfranchised and underinvested communities in Seattle.

The City has already spent significant energy and time developing a strategy around equitable transit-oriented development. The transportation levy is an opportunity to put the funding behind it. The Council could do so by increasing the overall package to the $1.7 billion that advocates are demanding; polling shows that voters would approve a transportation levy up to $1.9 billion. Council could also prioritize funding for our communities from the existing proposal. Providing $30 million for our communities to continue our work and implement solutions that address displacement neighborhood-wide would be a small stride toward a more equitable proposal. It is also a chance for the Council to make a bold investment in a strategy to keep communities in place, taking us one step closer to a Seattle that is vibrant, equitable, and diverse.

Karen Sataka is a born-and-raised Seattle resident of over 70 years and the owner of Bush Garden Restaurant and Bar. She is an activist and organizer with the CID Coalition and organizes for a thriving city where people from all economic, cultural, and religious backgrounds can live side by side, valuing the richness in the diversity of all its residents.

Hieu Tran is the President of The Vietnamese Buddhist Community, Co Lam Temple, and a member of the Graham Street Community Action Team.

Slayman Appadolo fulfills multiple roles for the Cham Refugees Community as a project assistant, leading other real estate development efforts for the organization, and a member of the Graham Street Community Action Team.

The Stranger

U District Street Fair, Norwegian Constitution Day Celebration & Parade, and More Cheap & Easy Events Under $15

by EverOut Staff

The weekend is calling with low-key, high-fun events from the U District Street Fair to the Norwegian Constitution Day Celebration & Parade and from Thunderpussy Live at Easy Street Records to a Book Signing with Kat Lieu at Lucky Envelope Brewing. For more ideas, check out our guide to the top events of the week.

FRIDAY
COMMUNITY

Norwegian Constitution Day Celebration & Parade
Known as Syttende Mai (literally “17th of May”), Norwegian Constitution Day celebrations will take over Seattle’s own Scandinavian-influenced neighborhood on Friday. The National Nordic Museum is hosting a luncheon gala and free family activities like “Fjord Horses” and a Nordic express train in the parking lot all day long. Check out an all-star lineup of Nordic talent at Bergen Place in the afternoon before securing your spot along the parade route. Celebrating its 50th anniversary, the parade will start at NW 62nd and 24th Ave NW, then head south past the Leif Erikson Lodge and Bergen Place before coming to an end near The Walrus and the Carpenter. Pro tip: the colors of the Norwegian flag are mostly red, some blue, and a little bit of white. Sound familiar? SHANNON LUBETICH
(Ballard, free)

The Stranger

“Let the dollar circulate, let the dollar circulate.”

by Charles Mudede

Many years ago, I came up with a joke for all heavy boozers trying to lose weight. It goes like this: They prefer a Republican diet. My meaning? When it comes to government spending, the right likes to cut everything—healthcare, food stamps, social security, you name it—except the military budget. A boozer looking to lose a few pounds is similar in the sense that they make big cuts on everything—chips, sugar-addled drinks, sweets, you name it—except liquor.

This kind of bad rationalization presently informs our City Hall’s economic thinking and policies, as exemplified by the recent passage of a police contract that will add an astonishing $96 million to the city’s apparently strapped budget. And so, as Seattle slashes library hours, and plans to downsize public education, it’s expanding like nobody’s business the only armed (to the teeth) service on its budget. This, on a national scale, is called military Keynesianism.

As everyone with some education in what’s called heterodox economics, an economic program that has some contact with reality and takes history seriously, there is no such thing as a budget deficit (check out the current Modern Monetary Theory of Stephanie Kelton). Instead, we have the politics of distribution: who gets a little, and who gets a lot. There is a good reason why economics used to be called political economy. It was more honest about this fact, about the role of class politics in the market. 

The produce of the earth—all that is derived from its surface by the united application of labour, machinery, and capital, is divided among three classes of the community; namely, the proprietor of the land, the owner of the stock or capital necessary for its cultivation, and the labourers by whose industry it is cultivated.

A retired and spectacularly successful stockbroker, David Ricardo, wrote these words in 1817. They opened his book On the Principles of Political Economy, and Taxation, which, at the time, had a reputation that was second only to the first major and comprehensive examination of capitalism, Adam Smith’s The Wealth of Nations. The 1870s, however, saw what’s called the marginalist revolution. This movement’s theories and policy prescriptions, which are with us to this day, dumped any mention of the political and promoted the ethereal science of economics.

History was abandoned and replaced by what Joan Robinson called “logical time.” Mathematics, usually in the form of high school algebra, was applied to all that mattered: supply and demand, the rules of perfect competition, and market equilibrium. The distribution of wealth? Ejected. The history of class conflict? Ejected. This history of discrimination? Ejected. Economics became the abstract space and time that our council used to make sense of what, in a rich city, doesn’t even exist, a budget deficit.

As John Maynard put it at the end of his book The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, which was influential during the brief period that broke with marginalist thinking (or what is called economics), from the 1930s to the 1960s: “Practical men who believe themselves to be quite exempt from any intellectual influence, are usually the slaves of some defunct economist.” This is zombie economics. This is the eight council members who voted to throw a bunch of money at our city’s only proto-military organization while it’s set to starve social services that mostly benefit the “less fortunate.”

There is more. The council’s present push to crush wage growth also describes an exceptionally poor understanding of capitalism itself. This ignorance can be explained by its unconscious devotion to another feature of orthodox economics (from the university to the press), microeconomics. Again, this mode of thinking goes all the way back to the marginalist revolution, which ejected the macroeconomics of political economy. Microeconomics focuses on individual market actors or agents, and so falls in what is called the fallacy of composition (confusing the part of a system with the whole of it). The result is a number of paradoxes that are obscure at a micro level but revealed at macro one.

The most relevant paradox, as it regards City Hall, is the paradox of cost. The heterodox economist Marc Lavoie explains it in this way:

[A] decrease in real wages will not raise the profits of firms and will instead lead to a fall in the rate of employment. This was explained by Kalecki in a Polish paper first written in 1939, where he concluded that ‘one of the main features of the capitalist system is the fact that what is to the advantage of a single entrepreneur does not necessarily benefit all entrepreneurs as a class’.

And so it is. I’m a Marxist forced to show capitalists how to do capitalism “mo’ better.” The paradox of cost concludes that what may be good for a firm (such as Sarah Nelson’s beer business) will not be good for the system as a whole (fallacy of composition) because, from a macroeconomic view, “higher real wages generate higher aggregate consumption, higher sales, higher rates of capacity utilization and hence higher investment expenditures, profit rates will be driven up” (Marc Lavoie). This fact is spelled out by the paradox of thrift.

Savers are actually bad for capitalism. And savers or the thrifty are found mostly at the top of the economic order (millionaires and billionaires). This class removes money from the dynamic system and parks it in tax havens, luxury condos, and so on. Workers, of course, can’t afford to save. They must throw their earnings right back into the market. In the right-as-rain words of Billy Paul, the working class “let the dollar circulate, let the dollar circulate.”

The Stranger

Call Now
Are you 21 or older? This website requires you to be 21 years of age or older. Please verify your age to view the content, or click "Exit" to leave.
Enable Notifications Yes, please keep me updated No thanks
Skip to toolbar